The Devil and Michael Boyle

For at least 15 years, and probably longer, I have suffered from depression.  I suppose I am fortunate, in that my depression is not as severe as it is for many people, at least based on some people's accounts that I have heard.  Nevertheless, I truly have it, and it has very real medical symptoms.  When the episodes hit, my appetite goes to nothing--I've gone a week eating only a couple of meals that I forced down through pure willpower.  I've had whole months where I would wake up every morning to prolonged bouts of nausea.  I know when I'm really in for it when, like clockwork, I suddenly snap awake at 3 or 4 in the morning, no matter how tired I am from the previous day's early rising.  So, I know that it is a real, physical condition.  And, fortunately for me, one that has proven responsive to antidepressants.

That's one, completely correct and descriptive way I have of understanding what is going on with me.  But it is not the only way.

People ask me if I believe in the devil.  I certainly do--I've met him.
Most often, he comes as a voice.  My voice.  His message to me varies depending on the circumstances, but the theme is remarkably consistent.  Whatever it is that I am doing, whatever challenges I am dealing with at the time, he tells me that people are watching me and constantly keeping score of my wins and losses.  In his calculation, any wins that I have are a product of the talents I have been given, and thus don't count for much.  The losses, well, the losses are all on me.  Despite stacking the deck against me like that, he tells me that this is the reality of the world, and that I better get to staving off those losses before someone notices.  And people are taking notice of my losses, no matter how trivial.  Any minute now, there will be a reckoning for those losses.  If those around me--co-workers, friends, family, whoever--haven't said anything yet, well, its only a matter of time for the hammer to come down.  Or, at least, so he tells me.

But its not simply about the day-to-day things where others are keeping score.  Ultimately what is at stake is the one thing that I want, and what everyone wants--love, and to be loved.  That love is always conditional, he says.  It is conditional on my ability to cover up my warts and imperfections.  People must not see the real me, he says, the one that is broken and flawed and scared and wounded.  Why would anyone love that?  He's not being cruel, he says, he's just being real.  No one would actually love you for you.  And if they appear to, either I have done a good job of conning them, or otherwise their apparent love is really just for show--a misplaced kindness borne out of pity.  Because, he says, I know the real truth, and I know he is right.

For a very long time, I have been convinced that his voice actually is my voice.  Recently, I have come to start to separate his voice from my own.  I don't believe it is my voice because I do not think I am as cruel as he is.  I don't think I've met anyone as cruel as he is.  But more importantly, I have come to see that he is a liar.  People are not keeping score, waiting to pounce of every trivial error I make.  The people who love me actually do so with full knowledge of who I am.  And the God that I have believed in my whole life doesn't look at me the way the voice tells me that everyone does.  In fact, He sent His son to prove it to us, and to me.

So, the voice is a liar.  But they are lies that are sometimes hard to ignore.  And I know that there will be times, the dark times, when I will believe those lies.  I have before.  I am sure I will again.

Yes, I believe in the devil.  I've met him.

Comments

Mary Pat Lichtman said…
Mike, Jason is here for a day or two visiting us now. I am married to his Dad. He reminded me of your blog and I'm interested in your thoughts. These are common thoughts among religious people. I think Catholics suffer a lot more than Protestants, but Jews are probably not far away. Thanks for sharing and if you want to talk further, please email me directly at mplichtman@live.com.
October 21, 2013 at 8:38 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Jesus Doesn't Care if You Masturbate, and Other Provocations

Image
1.  A couple of weeks ago, I stumbled upon this post on the Patheos Catholic channel .  In it, a young woman named Marina S. Olsen began what she promised is a series of posts discussing sexual sins, and she begins with masturbation.  To call the post alarmist would not do it justice--even in the heyday of the drug scares in the 80s, an anti-drug ad that adopted this tone would be seen as over-the-top.   But something struck me in reading her post--Ms. Olsen believes, with an apparently unshakable conviction, that what the Catholic Church has to say about masturbation is true.  Actually, that's not quite right--she takes as a given  that what the Church says about masturbation is true.  It is noticeable that at no point does she try to do the Dr. Greg trick, which is to justify her opposition to masturbation on the basis of ostensibly neutral or scientific grounds .  No, her thesis is that people despair about masturbation because masturbation is going to result in those folks
Read more

Another Theology of the Body, Part VI--A Theological Exploration of the Clitoris

I was introduced to The Body's Grace by Frank from Letters to the Catholic Right in this post , where he quotes Williams saying: It puts the question which is also raised for some kinds of moralist by the existence of the clitoris in women; something whose function is joy. If the creator were quite so instrumentalist in ‘his’ attitude to sexuality, these hints of prodigality and redundancy in the way the whole thing works might cause us to worry about whether he was, after all, in full rational control of it. But if God made us for joy…? I want to talk about the first part of that quote here, regarding the clitoris.  I am not aware of any theology that has been done on the clitoris, but there should be.  As Williams alludes to, the existence and nature of the clitoris is a theological "problem," especially if you want to hold on to traditional Christian sexual morality.  It is especially problematic if you want to hold that sexuality needs to be understood through the
Read more

Holy Sex!--Part 3.3 Getting Down to Business, Part II

Chapter 12 is about foreplay.  Most everyone acknowledges that foreplay is good, and this chapter is no exception.  Popcak makes the interesting but seemingly effective choice to break foreplay down into the various senses.  So, for example, under seeing he discusses things like wearing lingerie, under smell he suggests to use scented candles, etc.  There is nothing revolutionary or earthshaking here, but the suggestions are solid and reasonable. He also provides an unambiguous defense of oral sex.  Some might be puzzled as to why oral sex needs defending, but the traditional position of the Church opposed oral sex--hence the reason it was traditionally grouped with anal sex under the heading of "sodomy."  So, Popcak is stepping out a bit on a limb here, and he deserves his kudos for that.  He also makes clear that oral sex goes both ways, subject only to the One Rule.  Good on him for recognizing the needs of the ladies in this realm. I could see how his constant use of
Read more