I Always Feel Like, Somebody's Watching Me

I live in Columbus, Ohio, and so the big controversy around here in the Catholic world of late was the firing of Carla Hale.  Hale had been a teacher at Bishop Watterson High School in Columbus for 19 years prior to her termination.  In March of this year, Hale's mother died, and the obituary mentioned that Hale was in a partnered relationship with another woman.  The parent of a Bishop Watterson student saw the obituary in the local paper and wrote and anonymous letter to the Diocese of Columbus informing them that Hale was in a gay relationship.  On March 28, Holy Thursday, Bishop Watterson fired Hale.  The matter has since settled out of court, but a condition of that settlement is that Hale will not be teaching at Bishop Watterson.

Consider also the case of Lennon Cihak.   Last November, Cihak, 17, was parishoner at Assumption Catholic Church in Barnesville, Minnesota, along with his parents. Cihak was in parish's Confirmation class, scheduled to be Confirmed some time during the 2012-13 school year.  That is, until he was told he could no longer be part of the Confirmation class, due to the fact that Cihak posted a picture(see left) on Facebook expressing his opposition to the at the time pending amendment to the Minnesota constitution which would ban gay marriage. Apparently, Fr. Gary LaMoine, the pastor of Assumption, discovered this photo while searching through Cihak's Facebook page.  Cihak was told that he was no longer eligible to be Confirmed unless he publicly repented.  His parents were also excluded from Communion.

While I certainly don't agree with either decision by the Church, I don't think the final outcome of both cases is that noteworthy.
At the end of the day, the Catholic Church is allowed to decide who it will and will not Confirm.  With regard to Hale, things are a little murkier, but private institutions can impose morals clauses on their employees, and Hale evidently signed such an agreement.  It may be a raw deal, and it may be unwise, but it is not improper.

Far more interesting to me is how Church authorities found out about Hale and Cihak.  Hale was, in essence, ratted out by an anonymous informer.  Cihak, evidently, was discovered via Facebook stalking by the pastor and his secretary.  Either way, the lesson for anyone who wants to continue to be a Catholic while holding some unapproved views is that one must actively police one's own media presence, less you get turned in by someone who is watching out for divergent opinions.

I don't think I am going out on much of a limb to say that if parishoners feel as if they have to watch anything they do and say in order to maintain good standing in the Church, then Catholic life will rapidly turn very toxic.  Anyone who has been a part of life in a parish (or any congregation, or any other kind of organization for that matter) knows that busy-bodies and gossips are just part of the deal.  If someone tells someone who tells one of these would-be informers about your Facebook page, or Twitter feed, or any casual conversation you've had, it makes it hard to form an actual community.  You will spend all of your time worrying about who is watching you.

To be fair, I don't actually think that Catholicism will turn into East Germany.  But the reason I don't think it will happen is because I don't think people will put up with it.  They will just walk.  There is a reason that "McCarthyism" is still a term that has resonance in America 60 years after Joe McCarthy was in the Senate.  The idea that you will be punished for what you say, or for your beliefs, runs counter to a core principle of being an American.  That's not how things are supposed to work in this country.  If you try to impose a "watch what you say" regime on a large mass of Americans, but yet give them an opportunity to walk away, I believe they will walk away.

Catholicism cannot afford to go down this road.  No one wants to be a part of a religion that acts as a Thought Police.  And they won't

Comments

James the Greater said…
Except Senator McCarthy was correct; the Soviets were actively infiltrating most aspects of american life. See the Venona Project. Please stop further tarnishing the reputation of a great American who has been so unfairly pilloried by the liberal (read- communist) media.

JtG
September 10, 2013 at 4:04 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Theology of the Body, Part VI--A Theological Exploration of the Clitoris

I was introduced to The Body's Grace by Frank from Letters to the Catholic Right in this post , where he quotes Williams saying: It puts the question which is also raised for some kinds of moralist by the existence of the clitoris in women; something whose function is joy. If the creator were quite so instrumentalist in ‘his’ attitude to sexuality, these hints of prodigality and redundancy in the way the whole thing works might cause us to worry about whether he was, after all, in full rational control of it. But if God made us for joy…? I want to talk about the first part of that quote here, regarding the clitoris.  I am not aware of any theology that has been done on the clitoris, but there should be.  As Williams alludes to, the existence and nature of the clitoris is a theological "problem," especially if you want to hold on to traditional Christian sexual morality.  It is especially problematic if you want to hold that sexuality needs to be understood through the
Read more

On a Pelagian Politics, and Why It Would Be Good

I have two very hot takes.  The first is that Joe Biden is the best United States President in my lifetime, and probably the best since Franklin Roosevelt, and his many critics on both the right and the left are wrong.  The second is that the Irish monk Pelagius and his (mostly Celtic) disciples were basically right, and more specifically Pelagius's great opponent Augustine (and by extension the rest of the Western Church ever since) was wrong.  But the hottest take, the Hegelian synthesis of this Hotness, is that these two takes are ultimately the same take.  I believe that Biden is a great President because I am a Pelagian with a Pelagian world view, whereas American politics is fundamentally Calvinist, which is just Augustinianism taken to its logical conclusion. Let me try to justify this ball of hot takes. 1. Most of what we know of Pelagius comes from his opponents, especially Augustine and Jerome, who attempted (more or less successfully) to have him cast out of the church a
Read more

Jesus Doesn't Care if You Masturbate, and Other Provocations

Image
1.  A couple of weeks ago, I stumbled upon this post on the Patheos Catholic channel .  In it, a young woman named Marina S. Olsen began what she promised is a series of posts discussing sexual sins, and she begins with masturbation.  To call the post alarmist would not do it justice--even in the heyday of the drug scares in the 80s, an anti-drug ad that adopted this tone would be seen as over-the-top.   But something struck me in reading her post--Ms. Olsen believes, with an apparently unshakable conviction, that what the Catholic Church has to say about masturbation is true.  Actually, that's not quite right--she takes as a given  that what the Church says about masturbation is true.  It is noticeable that at no point does she try to do the Dr. Greg trick, which is to justify her opposition to masturbation on the basis of ostensibly neutral or scientific grounds .  No, her thesis is that people despair about masturbation because masturbation is going to result in those folks
Read more