New Project

I've been trying in various ways since starting this blog to broaden the focus, away from simply talking about religion.  It's not that I don't enjoy writing on the topic--my post count proves that--but it is not the only thing I want to write about.

In that spirit, I've decided to branch out a bit and write about games--primarily tabletop RPGs, but also video games and board games on occasion.  My idea is to write pieces that are somewhere in between a review and an essay, each covering a different game or some news in the world of games.

Because this is a pretty radically different topic from the material covered in this space, I've decided to create a separate blog with a separate URL for this game-related material--that way, if you have no interest in this topic whatsoever, you can easily avoid it (and, visa versa).  For now, the new blog is called "Play to See What Happens" and it will be located at playtoseewhathappens.blogspot.com.  There is only a placeholder there now, but I hope to have some material up in the next few weeks.  I don't anticipate posting to the new blog as frequently as I post here, but we will . . . see what happens.

This is as good a space as any to also thank everyone who reads this blog for their support and encouragement.  Special thanks to my twitter cheering section--@retrochbabe (Maureen Clarke), @frankstrong, @domirigaray (Dominique Iragaray), @wdlindsy (Bill Lindsey), and @PhilMuses.  You folks are the best.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Theology of the Body, Part VI--A Theological Exploration of the Clitoris

I was introduced to The Body's Grace by Frank from Letters to the Catholic Right in this post , where he quotes Williams saying: It puts the question which is also raised for some kinds of moralist by the existence of the clitoris in women; something whose function is joy. If the creator were quite so instrumentalist in ‘his’ attitude to sexuality, these hints of prodigality and redundancy in the way the whole thing works might cause us to worry about whether he was, after all, in full rational control of it. But if God made us for joy…? I want to talk about the first part of that quote here, regarding the clitoris.  I am not aware of any theology that has been done on the clitoris, but there should be.  As Williams alludes to, the existence and nature of the clitoris is a theological "problem," especially if you want to hold on to traditional Christian sexual morality.  It is especially problematic if you want to hold that sexuality needs to be understood through the
Read more

On a Pelagian Politics, and Why It Would Be Good

I have two very hot takes.  The first is that Joe Biden is the best United States President in my lifetime, and probably the best since Franklin Roosevelt, and his many critics on both the right and the left are wrong.  The second is that the Irish monk Pelagius and his (mostly Celtic) disciples were basically right, and more specifically Pelagius's great opponent Augustine (and by extension the rest of the Western Church ever since) was wrong.  But the hottest take, the Hegelian synthesis of this Hotness, is that these two takes are ultimately the same take.  I believe that Biden is a great President because I am a Pelagian with a Pelagian world view, whereas American politics is fundamentally Calvinist, which is just Augustinianism taken to its logical conclusion. Let me try to justify this ball of hot takes. 1. Most of what we know of Pelagius comes from his opponents, especially Augustine and Jerome, who attempted (more or less successfully) to have him cast out of the church a
Read more

Jesus Doesn't Care if You Masturbate, and Other Provocations

Image
1.  A couple of weeks ago, I stumbled upon this post on the Patheos Catholic channel .  In it, a young woman named Marina S. Olsen began what she promised is a series of posts discussing sexual sins, and she begins with masturbation.  To call the post alarmist would not do it justice--even in the heyday of the drug scares in the 80s, an anti-drug ad that adopted this tone would be seen as over-the-top.   But something struck me in reading her post--Ms. Olsen believes, with an apparently unshakable conviction, that what the Catholic Church has to say about masturbation is true.  Actually, that's not quite right--she takes as a given  that what the Church says about masturbation is true.  It is noticeable that at no point does she try to do the Dr. Greg trick, which is to justify her opposition to masturbation on the basis of ostensibly neutral or scientific grounds .  No, her thesis is that people despair about masturbation because masturbation is going to result in those folks
Read more