A Girardian Thought Experiment, Part I--What Is It To Be Human?
The law school I attended had (as still has) a professor of criminal law named Paul Robinson. I didn't have him for first year criminal law, but a number of my close friends did. One of his big areas of research in criminal law involved the idea of moral intuitions. Criminal law, and other areas of law for that matter, have often taken on a rationalistic and technical character, in which you attempted to come to the "correct" legal regime through the application of pure reason. Professor Robinson believed that this approach tends to de-emphasize and de-legitimize our basic moral sense of what is just--a basic intuition that is often a more reliable vehicle to achieving justice than our hyper-rational structures, especially when that intuition is "crowd sourced" and incorporates our collective wisdom. I was thinking about Professor Robinson's ideas while reading this essay by Rachel Held Evans . Evans writes about the dilemma that pro-life Christians f...