When the Rubber Meets the Road

I would suspect hat the most frequent criticism of Christianity in general, and Catholicism in particular, by those in the broader culture is that it is obsessed with sex--who is doing whom, when, and how.  Defenders will loudly protest that this is unfair--there is far more to Christianity than just rules about sex.  On its face, this 100% right; there is indeed far more to Christianity than sex.  But that defense is not really responsive to the challenge.  The question is not whether there are other elements in Christianity than sex.  The question is whether Christian leaders care about anything other than the sex part.

Back in April, the Catholic Archbishop of Santa Fe, New Mexico, issued a letter to the members of his diocese.  The topic?  Couples cohabitating before marriage.  It will come as little surprise that the Archbishop is not a fan, but the tone of the letter is especially strident.  In particular, the Archbishop states right from the beginning that people who are cohabitating should not take Communion.  Whether we are talking about people who are living together before getting married or a divorced person remarried (referred to the Archbishop as having a "civil union," which is an interesting choice of words), it doesn't matter--those folks are excommunicated.

Again, not a tremendous surprise.  But let's do a thought experiment.
Suppose the CEO or a major executive of Wal-Mart was Catholic and decided he or she wanted to get married in Santa Fe or Taos.  What do you figure the chance is that the Archbishop would have a problem with that?  You can bet the house that the answer would be no.  And, in fact, many would see the question itself as ridiculous.

Yet, no one can seriously contest that the manner in which Wal-Mart treats its workers is deplorable.  By controlling the number of hours its employees work, Wal-Mart goes out of its way to make sure many employees do not qualify for benefits.  Moreover, many of those same workers are forced to rely on food stamps and other public assistance to make ends meet.  Wal-Mart is vehemently anti-union, to the point that they are suing unions that protest outside of their stores in Texas.


Here's what Pope Leo XIII said in Rerum Novarum:
Let the working man and the employer make free agreements, and in particular let them agree freely as to the wages; nevertheless, there underlies a dictate of natural justice more imperious and ancient than any bargain between man and man, namely, that wages ought not to be insufficient to support a frugal and well-behaved wage-earner. If through necessity or fear of a worse evil the workman accept harder conditions because an employer or contractor will afford him no better, he is made the victim of force and injustice. --Rerum Novarum, paragraph 45 (full text here).

 Or, how about this:
We must consequently continue to study the situation of the worker. There is a need for solidarity movements among and with the workers. The church is firmly committed to this cause, in fidelity to Christ, and to be truly the "church of the poor."--Laborem Exercens [Pope John Paul II], paragraph 8 (full text here).

The labor practices of Wal-Mart are inconsistent with Catholic teaching.  Period.  And yet, the notion that the people who are responsible for these practices would suffer some any kind of impediment to the practice of Catholicism seems ridiculous.

And that's why people think that Christianity is obsessed with sex.  There is plenty of talk about social justice issues, but when it comes down to it, ignoring church teaching on those subjects does not carry the same penalties as flaunting the sexual teachings.  It's hard not to conclude from this that there are two types of sins--"real sins," which seems to be co-extensive with "sexual sins", and "other sins," which is not so much sins are they are failures to abide by aspirational statements.  People believe that Christianity is obsessed with sex, not because people don't understand that there is more to Christianity than sex, but because Christianity demonstrates that only sex is really taken seriously.


To be clear, I am not advocating for Wal-Mart executives to be denied Communion.  I don't think any group should be denied Communion in a blanket fashion.  But, when the rubber meets the road, I would like someone to take Christian social teaching as more than lip service.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Another Theology of the Body, Part VI--A Theological Exploration of the Clitoris

I was introduced to The Body's Grace by Frank from Letters to the Catholic Right in this post , where he quotes Williams saying: It puts the question which is also raised for some kinds of moralist by the existence of the clitoris in women; something whose function is joy. If the creator were quite so instrumentalist in ‘his’ attitude to sexuality, these hints of prodigality and redundancy in the way the whole thing works might cause us to worry about whether he was, after all, in full rational control of it. But if God made us for joy…? I want to talk about the first part of that quote here, regarding the clitoris.  I am not aware of any theology that has been done on the clitoris, but there should be.  As Williams alludes to, the existence and nature of the clitoris is a theological "problem," especially if you want to hold on to traditional Christian sexual morality.  It is especially problematic if you want to hold that sexuality needs to be understood through the
Read more

On a Pelagian Politics, and Why It Would Be Good

I have two very hot takes.  The first is that Joe Biden is the best United States President in my lifetime, and probably the best since Franklin Roosevelt, and his many critics on both the right and the left are wrong.  The second is that the Irish monk Pelagius and his (mostly Celtic) disciples were basically right, and more specifically Pelagius's great opponent Augustine (and by extension the rest of the Western Church ever since) was wrong.  But the hottest take, the Hegelian synthesis of this Hotness, is that these two takes are ultimately the same take.  I believe that Biden is a great President because I am a Pelagian with a Pelagian world view, whereas American politics is fundamentally Calvinist, which is just Augustinianism taken to its logical conclusion. Let me try to justify this ball of hot takes. 1. Most of what we know of Pelagius comes from his opponents, especially Augustine and Jerome, who attempted (more or less successfully) to have him cast out of the church a
Read more

Jesus Doesn't Care if You Masturbate, and Other Provocations

Image
1.  A couple of weeks ago, I stumbled upon this post on the Patheos Catholic channel .  In it, a young woman named Marina S. Olsen began what she promised is a series of posts discussing sexual sins, and she begins with masturbation.  To call the post alarmist would not do it justice--even in the heyday of the drug scares in the 80s, an anti-drug ad that adopted this tone would be seen as over-the-top.   But something struck me in reading her post--Ms. Olsen believes, with an apparently unshakable conviction, that what the Catholic Church has to say about masturbation is true.  Actually, that's not quite right--she takes as a given  that what the Church says about masturbation is true.  It is noticeable that at no point does she try to do the Dr. Greg trick, which is to justify her opposition to masturbation on the basis of ostensibly neutral or scientific grounds .  No, her thesis is that people despair about masturbation because masturbation is going to result in those folks
Read more